MITRE ATLAS — Practitioner Detail
MITRE ATLAS (Adversarial Threat Landscape for Artificial-Intelligence Systems) is a knowledge base that organizes attacks against AI/ML systems into a MITRE ATT&CK-style tactic/technique matrix. Where the OWASP LLM Top 10 is an "app-risk checklist," ATLAS is an attacker knowledge base of "how adversaries actually move," organized by tactic stage. It is grounded in observed and researched cases.
- Original: MITRE ATLAS
Relationship to ATT&CK
- Same structure, terminology, and matrix approach as ATT&CK, so ATT&CK users adopt it readily.
- Inherits most tactics (reconnaissance, initial access, execution, exfiltration, etc.) from ATT&CK but reinterprets them for AI/ML.
- Adds two AI-specific tactics: ML Model Access and ML Attack Staging (crafting adversarial examples, etc.).
- Recommended use: ATT&CK for traditional infrastructure, ATLAS for AI-specific paths, together.
Structure
| Element | Description |
|---|---|
| Tactic | The adversary's goal per stage ("why"). ID e.g. AML.TA0004 |
| Technique | The means to the goal ("how"). ID e.g. AML.T0051 |
| Sub-technique | Variations of a technique (e.g., direct/indirect prompt injection) |
| Mitigation | Defenses countering a specific technique |
| Case study | Real attacks mapped to tactics/techniques |
Counts grow by version (v5.1.0, Nov 2025 added the Command and Control tactic → 16 tactics). Always check the official site for exact IDs/counts. ATLAS data is also provided in STIX 2.1.
Tactic flow (16)
Reconnaissance → Resource Development → Initial Access
→ [AI] ML Model Access → Execution → Persistence → Privilege Escalation
→ Defense Evasion → Credential Access → Discovery
→ Collection → [AI] ML Attack Staging → Exfiltration → Impact
→ Command and Control
- [AI] marks the AI-specific tactics (ML Model Access, ML Attack Staging).
- The rest are inherited from ATT&CK and applied to the AI context.
Representative techniques (examples)
Exact IDs/names shift by version, so the below is for grasping the nature.
| Tactic | Technique example |
|---|---|
| ML Model Access | Inference-API access, querying to replicate a model |
| ML Attack Staging | Crafting adversarial examples, training a surrogate model |
| Initial Access | Prompt injection (AML.T0051, direct/indirect) |
| Exfiltration | Model extraction, training-data extraction |
| Impact | Disabling/misbehaving the model, denial of service |
Extension to generative AI & agents
ATLAS has been rapidly reflecting the LLM/agent attack surface (examples):
- Prompt injection (direct/indirect) — initial access
- RAG database retrieval/poisoning — collection/poisoning
- AI agent tool abuse / publishing poisoned tools — execution/persistence
- Credentials from AI agent configuration, AI agent context poisoning
- MCP server compromise case study — targeting MCP infrastructure
These map directly to LLM01 (injection), LLM06 (excessive agency), and LLM08 (vector/embedding) of the OWASP LLM Top 10.
ATLAS vs OWASP LLM Top 10
| Aspect | MITRE ATLAS | OWASP LLM Top 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Attack tactic/technique KB (ATT&CK-style) | App-risk checklist |
| View | Attacker flow (by stage) | Defensive checklist |
| Use | Threat modeling, red-teaming, detection mapping, case learning | Assessment checklist, defense design |
| Relationship | The attack path by stage | What to check along that path |
They complement each other: attack flow (ATLAS) ↔ defensive checks (OWASP).
Practical use
- Threat modeling: derive an AI system's attack paths by tactic stage; check which stages are exposed.
- Red-team planning: use tactics/techniques as a shared scenario language (within an authorized scope).
- Detection/response mapping: connect per-technique mitigations/detection points to SOC detection rules.
- Case learning: understand how real attacks unfold via case studies.
- Assessment linkage: referencing ATLAS in the threat-modeling step of 04. Assessment methodology reinforces the "real attack scenario" axis.
Summary
- ATLAS = the ATT&CK of AI attacks. Tactic (goal) × technique (means) matrix + mitigations + real cases.
- ATT&CK inheritance + AI-specific tactics (ML Model Access, ML Attack Staging) + a fast-growing set of LLM/agent techniques.
- Paired with OWASP LLM Top 10: ATLAS for the attack flow, OWASP for the defensive checks.